Guides

Conducting a Structured Recruitment Interview | Complete Guide

The structured interview method that doubles your success rate. Questions, evaluation, biases to avoid. Practical guide with examples.

20 min de lecture
Conducting a Structured Recruitment Interview | Complete Guide
51%
Predictive validity of structured interview
14%
Predictive validity of unstructured interview
65%
Structured interview + cognitive test
3.6x
Success rate improvement vs unstructured interview

Why structure your interviews

A structured interview predicts 51% of future performance. An unstructured interview? Only 14%. With a free-form interview, you're as likely to hire the right person as flipping a coin. With a structured interview, you triple your chances.

A structured interview relies on 4 pillars: same questions for all candidates, behavioural questions based on past facts, evaluation grid with predefined criteria, standardised scoring on each criterion.

Predictive validity by interview type (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998)

Interview typePredictive validityInterpretation
Unstructured interview (conversation)14%Close to chance
Semi-structured interview31%Better, but insufficient
Structured interview51%Recommended method
Structured interview + test65%Optimal combination

Prepare the interview in 3 steps

  1. 1

    Define evaluation criteria

    Before the interview, list the 5 to 7 key skills to evaluate. Distinguish hard skills (technical abilities), soft skills (behavioural qualities) and culture fit. Weight each criterion (total = 100%) and indicate which are mandatory.

    • Maximum 7 criteria to stay focused
    • Distinguish mandatory vs desirable
    • Define what each score (1 to 5) means
  2. 2

    Prepare behavioural questions

    For each criterion, prepare 2 to 3 behavioural questions in STAR format. Behavioural questions ask candidates to describe a past real situation, not a hypothetical future one.

    • Format: "Describe a situation where you had to [skill]..."
    • No hypothetical questions ("How would you react?")
    • Prepare STAR follow-ups to go deeper
  3. 3

    Create the interview grid

    The grid standardises evaluation: same questions in same order, space for factual notes, score per criterion, space for final recommendation. Essential to objectively compare several candidates.

The STAR method in detail

STAR = Situation, Task, Action, Result. Each candidate answer should cover these 4 elements. If not, follow up.

The 4 STAR elements and how to get them

ElementWhat you're looking forFollow-up if missing
SituationContext, stakes"Can you describe the context?"
TaskTheir role, responsibilities"What exactly was your role?"
ActionWhat they specifically did"What exactly did you do?"
ResultOutcome, learning"What was the measurable result?"

Hypothetical vs behavioural questions

CritèreTo avoidTo use
Conflict resolution"How would you react to a difficult customer?""Describe a situation where you managed a difficult customer."
Organisation"Are you organised?""Give me an example of a project with multiple simultaneous priorities."
Leadership"Can you manage a team?""Tell me about a difficult decision you made as a manager."

Interview structure (60 minutes)

One-hour interview schedule

PhaseDurationObjective
Welcome and put at ease5 minRelaxed candidate = true potential visible
Company / role presentation10 minClear context, honest about challenges
Candidate questions (STAR)35 minEvaluate each criterion with facts
Candidate's questions8 minClarify AND assess interest
Conclusion2 minNext steps and committed timeline

The 70/30 rule

The candidate should speak 70% of the time. If you speak more, you learn nothing. Your role is to listen, take factual notes and follow up with STAR questions.

After the interview: evaluation and decision

1

Within 15 minutes

Complete your notes, assign score (1 to 5) to each criterion, note strengths and concerns, write your recommendation.

2

Calculate weighted score

Weighted score = sum of (criterion score × criterion weight). Example: Prospecting 4/5 × 20% = 0.8 + Negotiation 5/5 × 20% = 1.0 + Communication 4/5 × 15% = 0.6... Total = overall score.

3

Multi-evaluator debrief

If several evaluators: each scores independently before meeting, share notes, discuss gaps (> 1 point), collegial decision.

Structured interview checklist

  • Evaluation criteria defined (5–7)

    Before seeing candidates

  • Behavioural questions prepared (2–3 per criterion)

    STAR format

  • Interview grid ready

    Same grid for all

  • CV read and annotated

    10–15 min prep

  • Clear introduction (duration, agenda)

    From the welcome

  • Factual notes in real time

    Quotes, figures, actions

  • Score assigned within 15 min

    Hot, before next candidate

  • If multi-evaluators: no discussion before scoring

    Independence of evaluations

0/8 effectué(s)0%

Structured interview FAQ

How long does it take to prepare a structured interview?
For a first recruitment on a given position, allow 1 to 2 hours to define criteria, write behavioural questions and create the grid. For subsequent recruitment in the same type, preparation reduces to 15 minutes of review and personalisation. Aurelia generates the grid automatically in 5 minutes.
Does the STAR method work for all profiles?
STAR is universal but adapts by profile. For junior profiles with limited professional experience, accept examples from studies, volunteering or community involvement. For very technical profiles (developers, experts), combine STAR with technical questions or real-world scenarios. STAR is less suitable for evaluating pure factual knowledge.
Must you really ask all candidates the same questions?
Yes, for key skill evaluation questions. This is the basis of objectivity: you can only compare what's comparable. You can personalise context questions ("What are you looking for in your next role?") and explore specific CV points. The core of the grid must remain identical.
How to manage a candidate who won't give concrete examples?
Insist with STAR follow-ups: "Can you give me a concrete example?", "What specifically did you do personally?", "What was the measurable result?". If after 3 follow-ups the candidate can't give concrete examples, they probably don't have the experience they claim — that's valuable information in itself.

Generate your interview grid in 5 minutes

Aurelia structures your interviews automatically: personalised grids, STAR questions, objective scoring.

Pour aller plus loin