Definition
Main Tests Used in Recruitment
Personality Test Comparison
| Test | Model | Scientific Validity | Primary Use Case | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Five (OCEAN) | 5 dimensions: Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism | Very high | Performance prediction, all roles | 30-45 min |
| DISC | 4 dimensions: Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, Conscientiousness | Moderate | Communication styles, management | 20-30 min |
| MBTI | 16 types across 4 dimensions (I/E, S/N, T/F, J/P) | Debated | Self-reflection, team development | 25-40 min |
| Insights Discovery | Colour code based on Jung (R/J/V/B) | Moderate | Team communication, cohesion | 25-35 min |
| Hogan | Personality, values, stress risks | High | Leadership roles, succession planning | 45-60 min |
Best Practices for Use
- 1
Choose the Right Test for Your Needs
Select a scientifically validated test suited to your context. For recruitment, prioritise Big Five (best predictivity). For team development, DISC or Insights are more accessible.
- 2
Administer at the Right Time in the Process
After validating the candidate's technical skills, typically at shortlist stage. Avoid administering too early to avoid unnecessarily burdening the process.
- 3
Train Recruiters in Interpretation
A poorly interpreted test leads to poor decisions. Train your teams in psychometrics basics. If possible, initially get support from an occupational psychologist.
- 4
Inform and Obtain Consent
Always inform candidates about test use, its purpose and how results will be used. Obtain explicit consent. Respect confidentiality (GDPR).
- 5
Integrate into a Multi-Method Approach
Never base a decision solely on a test. Use it as one element alongside interviews, technical skills, practical exercises. The test enhances, it does not replace.
Advantages and Limitations of Personality Tests in Recruitment
- Partial objectification of behavioural aspects difficult to assess in interview
- Reduction of certain cognitive biases (halo effect, similarity bias)
- Structured discussion basis to explore functioning modes
- Consistency between candidates (same tool for all)
- Post-hire development tool for integration and management
- Possibility of distorting answers to appear as expected
- Does not measure acquired competencies, only tendencies
- Risk of reinforcing certain biases (favouring extroverts, for example)
- Cost of certification and interpretation training
- Partial predictive validity: correlates with performance, does not guarantee it
Frequently Asked Questions about Personality Tests
Can a personality test eliminate a candidate?
Should the same test be used for all roles?
How to give test results feedback to candidates?
Is MBTI reliable for recruitment?
What is the legal framework for personality tests in the UK?
Integrate Personality Tests into Your Aurelia Process
Centralise psychometric results in candidate files, compare final profiles and analyse which traits predict success in your roles.
